Login Here

Dot Slash

Webmaster Comments

Launch Website

Web Solutions Provider

Overall Review Statistics

Layout (7.5)

7.5 stars

Color Theme (7)

7 stars

Objective / Purpose (7)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (4.5)

4.5 stars

6.4

6.5 stars

17 Reviews

The Negative

The "market your business online" text on the 3rd tab is a bit hard to read. And then of course the biggest downfall is the coding. I hate to be a stickler against the use of tables but it looks like that is what is being used in the non-flash areas to structure the content. Ideally you would structure those areas with css.

The Positive

I like it a lot. Before I looked at the coding, I had a hard time coming up with anything for the negative comments. Easy to understand, it's unique, etc.. Good job!

By dreamache @ November 13, 2007 | 10:24 am

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (3.0)

3 stars

6.8

7 stars

The Negative

A little slow with the animation on netscape 9 for mac. The other pages ( not the front page ) seem to crowded.

The Positive

The front page is awesome, well spaced, good colors, striking graphics.

By mbkool @ November 13, 2007 | 12:21 pm

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

7

7 stars

The Negative

took too long to load. Compress css, use javascript instead of flash. A little too much color would like to see it more uniformed.

The Positive

Nice design. I liked the roll overs for more info under hosting, design and marketing.

By kano @ November 13, 2007 | 6:28 pm

Layout (9.0)

9 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (9.0)

9 stars

Code / Semantics (4.0)

4 stars

6.8

7 stars

The Negative

Don't see any need for the Flash on the front page. Doesn't add to the design and seems pointless.

The Positive

Like the large graphic on the front page. It would be nice if it rotated a different person each time looking at the user.

By rentawebguy @ November 13, 2007 | 6:34 pm

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (6.0)

6 stars

Objective / Purpose (6.0)

6 stars

Code / Semantics (6.0)

6 stars

6.3

6.5 stars

The Negative

Coding could be a bit cleaner. The page is a bit animated, remember KISS, keep it simple...

The Positive

I like the colors and the layout alot. The layout is unique but useful, the design is also unique but pleasant. Very nice site.

By jbrown @ November 13, 2007 | 8:20 pm

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (9.0)

9 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

7.5

7.5 stars

The Negative

don't go to far with the animations I doubt that you made those home page and services icons yourself

The Positive

I really like the main image on the home page . I also like the way you structured the services page and subpages

By ackeb @ November 14, 2007 | 3:11 am

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (7.0)

7 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (7.0)

7 stars

7

7 stars

The Negative

It is clear that the creator of this site is more experienced in designing rather than coding. If I was looking for another designer to work with, I would think twice off hiring someone with bad coding skills, I would certainly hire this company for design, but not for coding. Large parts of the site uses tables for design and layout and the code is not valid. Not sure I would use flash in the way it has been here, could be done with css and javascript.

The Positive

lovely layout and design.

By Tjobbe @ November 14, 2007 | 5:55 am

Layout (6.0)

6 stars

Color Theme (7.0)

7 stars

Objective / Purpose (6.0)

6 stars

Code / Semantics (1.0)

1 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

- use CSS instead of bottommargin="0" leftmargin="0" topmargin="0" - table

The Positive

- color - beautiful home header - icons / buttons

By backdraft @ November 14, 2007 | 6:59 am

Layout (9.0)

9 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (3.0)

3 stars

7

7 stars

The Negative

The use of tables in the code is definitely a bad practice. Impractical roll over effect on the main banner, doesn't really do much or is that useful.

The Positive

Purpose of the website was very clear and it was organized into the 3 buckets, which made it even more clear. The color theme was interesting.

By risend @ November 14, 2007 | 1:18 pm

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (7.0)

7 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

6.5

6.5 stars

The Negative

I cannot say anything negative about this well designed site

The Positive

site layout is simple and elegant. Site's objective and pupose is very clear

By indya @ November 14, 2007 | 1:24 pm

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (7.0)

7 stars

7.5

7.5 stars

The Negative

looks like a video blog atleast from here, thats what it looks like, i dont know for sure

The Positive

good luck, hope that works

By liteon @ November 15, 2007 | 12:27 pm

Layout (5.0)

5 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (5.0)

5 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

- bad HTML Code - many Flash

The Positive

- great design - great color theme - structure is okay - font is readable - nice hover effects

By Marcel @ November 16, 2007 | 12:26 pm

Layout (5.0)

5 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (5.0)

5 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

- bad HTML Code - many Flash

The Positive

- great design - great color theme - structure is okay - font is readable - nice hover effects

By Marcel @ November 16, 2007 | 12:31 pm

Layout (9.0)

9 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (2.0)

2 stars

6.8

7 stars

The Negative

You guys do webpages - You should look behide the scences too. This page is not Valid HTML 4.0 Transitional! Result: Failed validation, 39 Errors.

The Positive

Extremely cool design and colors... I LIKE IT!

By Pat @ November 26, 2007 | 1:22 pm

Layout (9.0)

9 stars

Color Theme (9.0)

9 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (4.0)

4 stars

7.5

7.5 stars

The Negative

ITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULL

The Positive

ITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULLITS WONDERFULL

By greyhoundtr @ December 20, 2007 | 4:30 pm

Layout (5.0)

5 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (5.0)

5 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

Too much color. graphics not finished. put more details

The Positive

good navigation information is clear. pertinent content

By soniastory @ February 25, 2008 | 9:49 am

Layout (5.0)

5 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (5.0)

5 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

invalid coding in both html and css... nothing else

The Positive

very very very good design, good colors, very very very beautiful website

By nfsmaster @ July 21, 2008 | 3:31 am

Layout (10.0)

10 stars

Color Theme (10.0)

10 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (1.0)

1 stars

7

7 stars