Login Here

SiteVerdict!

Webmaster Comments

Launch Website

Let's review the review site! I'm not so concerned on receiving comments regarding the actual design, as I am about ways to expand the service. Things you think should be changed, or added in a feature perspective.

Overall Review Statistics

Layout (6.5)

6.5 stars

Color Theme (6)

6 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.5)

7.5 stars

Code / Semantics (6.5)

6.5 stars

6.7

6.5 stars

11 Reviews

The Negative

the logo is not original, too much classic... No icon, maybe some icon will make the site more funny

The Positive

the design is nice and clean. Very easy to use and to understand. Good concept idea.

By backdraft @ November 14, 2007 | 7:55 pm

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (7.0)

7 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

6.8

7 stars

The Negative

Not in love with the logo. It doesn't seem to go with the theme. It's OK, but could be better. Site could use more color. I had problems reviewing a site after launching it. I was looking all over for the link. There needs to be a more intuitive design to switch to review from launch

The Positive

Clean, simple layout.

By thehud @ November 14, 2007 | 8:31 pm

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (5.0)

5 stars

Code / Semantics (6.0)

6 stars

5.8

6 stars

The Negative

The navigation seems kinda of cluttered in some places. While I believe minimalism is a great thing I find that this site is missing some "punch" maybe a splash of at least one or more colors would help it out.

The Positive

I like the choice of font used. I like the touch of flair on each of the images, it makes them all seem like they belong and are a part of the page

By XanderGC @ November 15, 2007 | 12:58 am

Layout (4.0)

4 stars

Color Theme (2.0)

2 stars

Objective / Purpose (9.0)

9 stars

Code / Semantics (9.0)

9 stars

6

6 stars

The Negative

Very good layout, very easy to apprehend, good ergonmy. Lack of colors maybe, little bit too gray.

The Positive

Very good collaborative website concept.

By ghooghe @ November 15, 2007 | 5:12 am

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (3.0)

3 stars

Objective / Purpose (9.0)

9 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

6.3

6.5 stars

The Negative

I'm not too fond of the dashed border in the heading, but really like the logo. I do keep wanting to write on my monitor with a pen to add an apostrophe after the Verdicts in though - should it not be "The Verdict's In" ? Because I made changes after having heard what people had to say, I'd love it if I could get the site re-"verdict", so that the people who had already posted can re-review the site with the changes I have made. I would then need to update the preview as well though. I do notice a few people have given me 5's for coding and semantics, I don't know why but it could be because they have forgotten to change the rating or do not understand what this means. suggestion: would it not be an idea to ONLY count the score if they have actually clicked a score? Have the radio buttons unchecked to begin with for example. So if they rate 7, 7 and 7 but don't rate the code, the score is 7, and not 7,7,7,5 - which would make 6.5! Hope I'm making sense! So to summarise, just two suggestions: One is to re-review the site, and the other is to only score based on what has been checked and reviewed.

The Positive

Love the concept of the site, I will be back to submit more sites and review more sites regularly.

By Tjobbe @ November 15, 2007 | 6:04 am

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (7.0)

7 stars

Objective / Purpose (9.0)

9 stars

Code / Semantics (8.0)

8 stars

8

8 stars

The Negative

The links on the right side are lame and need more design.

The Positive

The site gets the point out of what it is immediatly, not only in domain name, but it explains itself right away with an attention getter. Feadture sites - needs to be more random sites.

By juicemann13 @ November 15, 2007 | 11:58 am

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (9.0)

9 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (9.0)

9 stars

8.5

8.5 stars

The Negative

if it fits all screens, then it is ok or else the settings need to be changed, the same happened to my site http://www.alltimemoney.blogspot.com

The Positive

Looks good

By liteon @ November 15, 2007 | 12:21 pm

Layout (5.0)

5 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (5.0)

5 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

I think it is too much information on the front page and it was not clear too me what to look at first

The Positive

I think it is an effective colour scheme

By monaro28 @ November 17, 2007 | 5:14 am

Layout (6.0)

6 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (8.0)

8 stars

7.5

7.5 stars

The Negative

Logo been done before. Graphic style is old and been done before.

The Positive

Structure is clean, effective, easy to navigate. Good functions.

By AndrewJMyers @ November 25, 2007 | 1:32 pm

Layout (5.0)

5 stars

Color Theme (6.0)

6 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (7.0)

7 stars

6.5

6.5 stars

The Negative

Finish the "Site verdict awards" it will help you a lot! You hawe a lot of bugs!

The Positive

You are makeing a good job with this site!!! Very good job! GBU

By ovysimon @ February 26, 2008 | 12:22 am

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (4.0)

4 stars

Objective / Purpose (9.0)

9 stars

Code / Semantics (4.0)

4 stars

6.3

6.5 stars

The Negative

Change the logo ! You have a lot of bugs!

The Positive

greate job!

By ttiahava @ February 26, 2008 | 1:25 am

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

6.8

7 stars