Login Here

Songs of praise

Webmaster Comments

Launch Website

Welcome to Songs of Praise, a unique source of original songs, plays and images.

Overall Review Statistics

Layout (5)

5 stars

Color Theme (3.5)

3.5 stars

Objective / Purpose (6.5)

6.5 stars

Code / Semantics (5)

5 stars

5

5 stars

8 Reviews

The Negative

Too much blue colour in this website!

The Positive

Greate site! I like your layout!

By ttiahava @ February 26, 2008 | 1:14 am

Layout (9.0)

9 stars

Color Theme (3.0)

3 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

6.3

6.5 stars

The Negative

nothindg negative abopute this website!\r\nPS:too mu hblue color!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The Positive

The color scheme works very well and it maintains a very simple, but interesting look.

By ovysimon @ February 29, 2008 | 4:54 am

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (4.0)

4 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

5.8

6 stars

The Negative

Each page contains more than 100 errors. Way too much! Check results at validator.w3.org Please review the W3C Standards for webpages! www.w3c.org

The Positive

Well... I don\'t know whta is positive about this website - it is not well coded, layout and graphics is even worse... looks like a page from 1990\'s... ever heard of CSS2.1?

By Pat @ March 22, 2008 | 10:42 am

Layout (1.0)

1 stars

Color Theme (1.0)

1 stars

Objective / Purpose (5.0)

5 stars

Code / Semantics (1.0)

1 stars

2

2 stars

The Negative

I think the site is too narrow. A few years ago this might have been okay but today most people have larger image display properties set. For my eyes, the blue writing on the blue background was hard to read.

The Positive

Site seems to be laid out nicely.

By FatGuyinAZ @ March 31, 2008 | 1:17 pm

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (6.0)

6 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (8.0)

8 stars

7.3

7.5 stars

The Negative

Default text isn\'t the prettiest.\r\n\r\nTabled layouts aren\'t the best, either.\r\n\r\nNot pleasing on the eyes.\r\n\r\nBland color scheme.\r\n\r\nBackground images... blah

The Positive

Ease of access for content.\r\n\r\nLots of it.

By MikeKnoop @ April 8, 2008 | 1:27 am

Layout (4.0)

4 stars

Color Theme (4.0)

4 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

The site made me feel icky. Welcome back to 1995,

The Positive

I\'m sure it was really snazzy to get the neighbors kid to make you a website.

By kiki @ April 9, 2008 | 9:11 am

Layout (1.0)

1 stars

Color Theme (1.0)

1 stars

Objective / Purpose (4.0)

4 stars

Code / Semantics (5.0)

5 stars

2.8

3 stars

The Negative

the cloud background really makes it not look good and the fact that you can still see the table borders is kinda bugging me

The Positive

The layout is alright and it is easy to read however you do need to work on somet hings

By bamf @ April 21, 2008 | 12:31 pm

Layout (3.0)

3 stars

Color Theme (4.0)

4 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (6.0)

6 stars

5

5 stars

The Negative

well the problem is your site doesn\'t was so amusing.. and there\'s a dead picture on the header.. please fix it...

The Positive

the purpose of the site so clear.

By vickydbz @ July 23, 2008 | 5:56 am

Layout (6.0)

6 stars

Color Theme (5.0)

5 stars

Objective / Purpose (8.0)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (6.0)

6 stars

6.3

6.5 stars