Login Here

PlanJam.com

Webmaster Comments

Launch Website

Allows users to find and plan local activities. Interested in feedback on layout, color scheme, and usability.

Overall Review Statistics

Layout (8.5)

8.5 stars

Color Theme (6.5)

6.5 stars

Objective / Purpose (8)

8 stars

Code / Semantics (6.5)

6.5 stars

7.3

7.5 stars

7 Reviews

The Negative

I couldn\'t find nothing wrong with this website. You are doing the damn thang!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

The Positive

I like the colors and how you got it laid out. You are very skilled. I wish I was that good. So good luck to you.\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\nSincerly,\r\nKKKingt2

By KKKingt2 @ March 17, 2008 | 2:56 pm

Layout (10.0)

10 stars

Color Theme (10.0)

10 stars

Objective / Purpose (10.0)

10 stars

Code / Semantics (10.0)

10 stars

10

10 stars

The Negative

The site looked really cool in the Small version thumbnail. and as, I launched the site. There is something missing. The Second left panel (the greenish grey one needs more contrast). \r\n\r\nThe next empty panels lack in contrast too But, if it is purpose made less contrast bcoz it is empty. That, this point should go to positive comments. :)\r\n\r\nPS: I\'m not a designer or anything. Just Started My web designing classes 2 months ago. So, bare with me if I\'m wrong ( I swear I\'m not studying a designing school :D, I learn from a web designer, who teaches as part time)

The Positive

The colors and and logo is kinda appealing the thumbnail seems pretty cool, but the real version needs some fine tuning. Overall the site looks cool.

By thrillerboy @ March 17, 2008 | 3:25 pm

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (6.0)

6 stars

Objective / Purpose (6.0)

6 stars

Code / Semantics (10.0)

10 stars

7.5

7.5 stars

The Negative

Horrible Coding... How can you produce ovber 200 Errors in just one document?\r\n\r\nhttp://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.planjam.com%2Fplan.php

The Positive

Very nice idea. Space for improvement concerning graphic layout and content (more options for specifications..)

By Pat @ March 22, 2008 | 10:35 am

Layout (8.0)

8 stars

Color Theme (3.0)

3 stars

Objective / Purpose (10.0)

10 stars

Code / Semantics (1.0)

1 stars

5.5

5.5 stars

The Negative

it\'s kinda crowdy and this makes it hard to manage,...and it has no color, too much white.Color and purpose..i don\'t know if they really work toghether

The Positive

it has lot of intereasting things, i mean is full of information, planning mode is good, content great,it\'s okay

By ovysimon @ March 24, 2008 | 1:53 pm

Layout (6.0)

6 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (7.0)

7 stars

Code / Semantics (7.0)

7 stars

7

7 stars

The Negative

None

The Positive

This site got nice logo and Layout.It is easy to use this site.This site got nice logo and Layout.It is easy to use this site.This site got nice logo and Layout.It is easy to use this site.

By ycerycerg @ June 22, 2008 | 6:39 am

Layout (10.0)

10 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (10.0)

10 stars

Code / Semantics (8.0)

8 stars

9

9 stars

The Negative

Nice layout. Although double left columns are out of style now. Color theme is good.

The Positive

Codes are clean. HTML is clean and simple.

By ucombo @ June 25, 2008 | 12:12 pm

Layout (9.0)

9 stars

Color Theme (8.0)

8 stars

Objective / Purpose (6.0)

6 stars

Code / Semantics (7.0)

7 stars

7.5

7.5 stars

The Negative

too different colors, Bad coding: 90 errors - http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.planjam.com/

The Positive

Nice site, Nice design

By nfsmaster @ July 21, 2008 | 3:10 am

Layout (7.0)

7 stars

Color Theme (3.0)

3 stars

Objective / Purpose (6.0)

6 stars

Code / Semantics (1.0)

1 stars

4.3

4.5 stars